https://etherscan.io/tx/0xea9519d1e02072035be852564203a8bfd40c42c759d3c29a0c67d0c9fc3cb41f
gm or gn.
Please find below some answers and responses to some recent questions and ideas.
Q. Are X7 Devs going to be looking after the aggregator integrations with 1inch .etc for example and will we expect these soon after our router, factory, and pairs contracts?
A. We will drive as many integrations as possible. When needed we will signal to the community when doing so isn't feasible and when we need support from the community to help drive the effort.
In addition we will soon be deploying the entire ecosystem on to a number of public test nets at the same contract address locations to aid any integration testing with third parties.
Q. Do the X7 Devs intend on an Xchange domain for the app before DAO?
A. app.x7.finance will be the domain for Xchange for the foreseeable future. This is consistent with other DEX dApp domains (see: app.1inch.io, app.uniswap.org).
Q. Should we plan to the setting up something like a gitbook for information - or will that be delivered upon release?
A. We will provide technical documentation in an open source manner (on github.com) and will invite the community to contribute as well.
Q. Is the overall Lending functionality of X7 solely Ethereum-focused (meaning token dependent on the chain it is deployed on, ETH for Ethereum, BNB for Smart Chain, FTM for Fantom) or will we see lending which would allow for liquidity pairs paired with Stablecoins for example?
A. We are happy to inform the community that the fundamental safeguards present in Xchange liquidity pairs are in NO WAY specialized for ETH/WETH. We absolutely foresee future lending activity to involve other base tokens, be them stable tokens or other wrapped assets.
Support for lending other assets will require a new lending contract, which we will provide. However, it is less likely that we would support the X7 Ecosystem building up an ecosystem lending pool for these kinds of assets for one simple reason - many of these assets have some amount of centralized control that could in theory result in stuck or lost assets (e.g. USDC has blacklist functionality).
Ultimately the DAO WILL be empowered to fund such an ecosystem pool or to otherwise support lending of other assets and we will support such propositions provided they do not put the safety of the ecosystem at risk.
Re: The marketing proposal, we LOVE the ideas put forth. Below are some comments and thoughts.
Idea 1: On-chain Messaging to Other Deployer Wallets
